| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 |
141. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Krawdad wrote: For now, disregarding the specifics I mentioned, do you think the idea could ever be used to achieve a compromise? Do you think limiting the production capabilities of the t2 BPOs is even worth considering? thats how it is r...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.23 18:47:00
|
142. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Jorma Morkkis wrote: shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: Now you need even more subs/invention chars to achieve the same profit Is there a problem? its a problem for brewie-¦s argument, that the removal of the BPO`s would cause more subscriptions
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.23 13:24:00
|
143. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: CCP should take the forum whine and the unsubs which will quickly be replenished by new players, higher player retention and of course new subs for invention alts. counterpoint: Now you need even more subs/invention c...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.23 12:31:00
|
144. Do bpos have run limits - in Science and Industry [original thread]
they have a 30 day limit on stations and Mineral capacity limit on POSes. No limit on the BPO itself, eventho the BPO shows different in its attributes.
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.23 07:38:00
|
145. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Kara Books wrote: Very professional post, Oversimplified, almost compelling, still doesn't provide any kind of answer to a problem. What do I mean? I believe I was pretty clear as to what I meant, in plain English. I dont know if they will ev...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.23 07:33:00
|
146. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Kara Books wrote: Mans got a point, Why arent new T2 BPO's being introduced or New T3 BPO's? :facepalm: sure, if you are desperately looking for analogies and want to take CCP decisions that have actually nothing to do With T2 BPO`s as a ar...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.23 01:07:00
|
147. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
funny that you only "allow" Akita T to be the only T2 BPO supporter here, even tho he is the one who is killing your points brutally by numbers, every time. Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: Akita the initial cost of t2BPO is not high, it was RP cheap a...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.22 19:27:00
|
148. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: I don't think anyone here would suggest that the Devs think T2BPO was a good idea what?
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.22 15:33:00
|
149. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: Kinda amusing how CCP is threatning to remove hard won and worked ISK from a goon LP and market manipulation scheme when CCP itself was dumping T2BPO's into the hands of chosen players that netted them billions of ISK for...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.22 10:00:00
|
150. Invention question (Ammo) - in Science and Industry [original thread]
5000 (crystals should be 4 irrc)
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.19 11:26:00
|
151. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Kara Books wrote: Quote: Cheaper than a Titan BPO, too. I rather have the titan, more fun =) Titan BPO does not mean he gets a free titan, Mr. Badass should read more carefully before you drop your extremly usefull oneliner, next time
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.18 18:29:00
|
152. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: An item that bitter vets had access to but new players are encouraged to spend 1000's of dollars on to obtain so they can succeed in producing T2 lines - without having any offcial numbers I call this pure bullshit...t...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.18 10:57:00
|
153. Quick T2 ship invention question - in Science and Industry [original thread]
as Kusum said, you get to choose wich one you wnat to invent in the invention window. By default its set as jaguar so you have to choose wolf for each invention. But I have to say that minmatar frig/destroyers is a though market.
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.18 10:30:00
|
154. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Kara Books wrote: But yhe, the T2 situation is in a current state of accidenlied. very nice semi-cool Oneliner! btw. didnt you get disqualified for posting unsourced fantasy numbers already?
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.17 23:01:00
|
155. Beware! Hulkageddon continued "indefinitely" - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Hemmo Paskiainen wrote: stop trolling you idioot, phew, thank god you added the extra "o" to not call him idiot, cos that would be stoopid rite? Quote: so yes basicly its a free isk printing machine worse than t2 bpos.. haha I always...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.16 11:15:00
|
156. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: [quote=shar'ra matcevsovski] Thread was closed once before and all that occurred was several threads on the T2BPO discussion opening by several different players. several chars, not players. Forums are made to discus...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.15 15:26:00
|
157. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: My opinion that anyone dumb enough to support T2BPO is probably a big enough idiot to steal from their employer or do the DEVS at CCP seriously support invention running alongside T2BPO's? Because if that is the case I ...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.15 14:39:00
|
158. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: As for providing evidence go use google or check old forum posts The reason why people ask you to provide evidences and numbers for your stories is not that they are not able to search for them on their own, its mor...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.11 17:00:00
|
159. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: how many times ppl have to show you, that they dont affect a huge part of the market? Because 70% of T2 line is not huge? Uhm ok keep telling yourself that T2BPO was not a huge mistake....
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.11 15:01:00
|
160. T2BPO why they should be removed and how. - in Science and Industry [original thread]
cute, whenever the thread keeps calming down, brewlar bumps it after some time... Quote: The point was that content was put into the game that effects a huge stake in the market yet is no longer being given out. It would have been ok if the i...
- by shar'ra matcevsovski - at 2012.06.10 20:16:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |